Winner, Winner, Chicken Dinner

Well, I did it. I entered my very first cooking contest.
In entering the recipe that I did I also took a big risk. Even though the rules of the contest didn’t stipulate that the recipe had to be something simple or easy to prepare, I felt no matter what it was necessary for [...]

Fathers and the parenting equation

by PJ Mullen on November 16, 2009

in Don't Fathers Matter

Me and little manEvery once in a while there is an article or a news story about dads and fatherhood that really rubs me the wrong way. It has been a while since one has come through my stream that has annoyed me as much as the New York Times article “Fathers Gain Respect From Experts (And Mothers)” that Ron at Clark Kent’s Lunchbox posted last Thursday.

In this particular case it wasn’t the article or the study on fatherhood it detailed, but rather the manner in which the results of the study were heralded as earth shattering news. In this new study it was ‘discovered’ that families did better when both the mother and father were involved in parenting their children.

Seriously? Should any one of us consider this to be a stunning revelation?

No, it is called parenting for a reason. Not mothering, not fathering. It takes two to raise a child in a way that affords them to become a healthy, happy, productive member of society. It is a touch disturbing that it took a study by highly educated sociologists and psychologists costing untold sums of money when we easily could have just consulted Captain Obvious.

The study was financed by the California Office of Child Abuse Prevention, which is looking for ways to involve fathers more at the state’s many family resource centers. Experts say improving the way fathers are treated in many settings, public and private, is an important public health goal.

For example, they say, pictures of families on the walls of clinics and public agencies should have fathers in them. All correspondence should be addressed to both mother and father. Staff members should be welcoming to men. Steps like these promote early and lasting involvement by fathers.

Again, seriously? They needed a study for this?

It really shouldn’t surprise anyone with functioning grey matter that it is only human nature to withdraw from a situation if you are being marginalized regardless of whether it is in relation to being a parent, an employee or a friend.

Despite signs of improvement it is still overwhelmingly obvious that fathers and the role they play in their children’s lives continue to be marginalized. Parenting magazines are horrid, in some states the father doesn’t get to attest to his own paternity and the fact that the necessary facilities for men to attend to their children’s needs are still lacking (at least where I live) are only but a few small examples.

By no means am I trying to diminish the message that this study is trying to send. Parenting is hard work. It takes a mother and father working together not only on the needs of the child, but on the needs of the underlying relationship, regardless of their marital status.

That mothers and fathers will approach parenting situations and teaching moments differently should be accepted within the framework of the relationship the parents have with one another. It is only with this understanding that an environment that fosters support, respect and a sense of encouragement between the parents can be achieved.

Hopefully before another study like this gets commissioned someone has some sense knocked into them and they drop me an email. I’ll be more than happy to organize a group of my fellow parent bloggers to discuss this issue. I’m confident that we could figure it all out over an extended weekend ‘work session’ in the tropics.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
  • Google Buzz
  • You go, boy...I mean...DAD!
  • Ha! Thanks, you want in on the junket? :)
  • I think the amount of stupid studies outnumbers the useful ones about 1000 to 1. It drives me crazy the amount of government money that is handed out to these wastes of time.
  • Exactly, I could have done the same study for a fraction of the cost and probably half the time. Plus, we could have had an awesome blogger meetup.
  • I read that same article and I was just as offended. What has happened to our culture? Why have fathers been pushed aside? We must make our voices heard. Real fathers exist and make a difference. And don't even get me started on those parenting magazines.
  • The only thing parenting magazines are good for are starter fuel for campfires. Fortunately, there are dads like you that will help carry the torch to change perceptions.
  • divamom
    I wanna be your panel too!
  • Sounds good, I'll let you know when and where :)
  • It is amazing :
    1st- how much common sense is NOT out there
    2nd- how much these common sense research projects become almost necessary to explain the need for fathers after seeing how excluded fathers are from some parenting magazines, media, and resources. It's a way to force feed common sense to the media. It's a catch 22 if you ask me. To me it speak more to where our society has been, where it is at now, and how far we have to go.
  • You hit that one on the head, we do have a very long way to go.
  • Seattledad
    Great point PJ. And, I want to be on your panel.
  • Ha! You're in. I didn't think it would be too tough to recruit for that
  • mrman
    Dude, this is horrible. Society underestimates fathers as a whole. I wish the study would talk to real dads to get the real scoop.
  • Unfortunately that would make too much sense. All we can hope for is to continue to be agents of change.
  • surprisedmom
    That study can be summed up by the title, "Justifying my job," or maybe "Saving my ass in an unsteady job market."

    It also can be a case of academics who have no clue what the real world is like pontificating on paper.

    Studies like this, especially ones funded by tax payer dollars really make me nuts. See the steam coming out of my ears?

    Captain Obvious. . . that was funny!
  • Ha! You're exactly right. I'm guessing they could just asked the families directly. But that probably would have been too easy.
  • I know you and I share similar thoughts on how much it drives us nuts that people don't understand that Dads are active parts of the parenting equation. The only thing I can think of is that the people conducting these studies grew up in a time when that was not the case and thus the answers they find amaze them.

    I know that Dads still work. But, more moms work today as well. The best equation for parenting success is loving, active parents. I don't care if it is one, two or more. As long as they are loving and active it makes for a great family experience.
  • That is a great point, C.C., but you would hope that the sociologists would be better informed than that. And I agree with you totally that engaged parents are the key to success when it comes to providing the best for our children. I'm still new to the game, but I'm willing to make some obvious sacrifices to do what I'm doing to ensure my son gets all that he deserves.
  • Cound me in to be on your 'panel'. It is amazing that money gets spent in the bazilions to tell us common sense. Let's take this to Oprah or a secluded beach front area with a tiki bar where we can hammer out the facts.
  • Absolutely, let's move the dad blogs convention to Bermuda and see if we can turn it into a junket, er, research project.
blog comments powered by Disqus

Previous post:

Next post: